<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 April 2014 14:06, Les Mikesell <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com" target="_blank">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <<a href="mailto:smooge@gmail.com">smooge@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>None of which really addresses the issue of elegant designs that scale<br>
down as well as up or help with version-tracking of packages across<br>
some number of systems.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>My last post on this to the list because it isn't on-topic anymore and KB doesn't need to drop the hammer on me. My view is that elegant designs in computers all look different to each person due to the fact that their life experience, brain mapping, and mood of the day makes it so. And because of that, I will see constant churn and redesign no matter how stupid it is. I can either learn to adapt and keep going, or I can get out of computers and go into something more glacial paced like farming (which I have been very tempted to do every 2-3 emails from Lennart P.). That is it and I am done here unless there is something CentOS related.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div>
</div></div>