<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 May 2014 11:02, Jim Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jperrin@centos.org" target="_blank">jperrin@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As we gear up for the upcoming CentOS 7 release, we're tracking a few<br>
things for the CentOSPlus kernel as well. One of the proposals (via<br>
<a href="http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828" target="_blank">http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828</a> ) is that we change the current<br>
name of the centosplus kernel to be a bit more consistent with other<br>
kernel names. The proposed new name would look like 'kernel-plus' or<br>
'kernel-centosplus'. This is in keeping with other kernel names such as<br>
'kernel-ml', 'kernel-xen', 'kernel-lt' etc. And allows for<br>
/etc/sysconfig/kernel to be used to set the DEFAULTKERNEL as desired.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>kernel-plus sounds good. I think it would help deal with bugs a bit better. kernel-centosplus is a bit long but might be clearer in case a downstream wants to have its own plus kernel.</div>
</div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div>
</div></div>