<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.666666984558105px">My vote would also be to keep the version numbering in line with RHEL.</span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:01 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Goldfinger@inhouse.wko.at" target="_blank">Michael.Goldfinger@inhouse.wko.at</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Morning all,<br>
<br>
I am a real newbie. In fact I just registered to give my two cents about the release numbering discussion.<br>
<br>
My vote would be to keep the version numbering in line with RHEL too.<br>
I have always found that version numbers that increase normally are much more logical that version numbers that include a date.<br>
<br>
However as someone who has not installed any Linux distributions before I do not really care about version numbering.<br>
I choose CentOS because I think it best matches my needs. Currently I am waiting for CentOS 7 to start with the fresh version but<br>
at the end it all comes down to download the latest versions from the repositories, I do not even look at the version numbers.<br>
It was a coincident that I found out that 7 is on the way and I decided to wait for it.<br>
<br>
Hope this helps.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Michael<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>SZ Quadri<br><a href="http://sz.quadri.in" target="_blank">http://sz.quadri.in</a><br><br>
</div>