<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Karanbir Singh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org" target="_blank">mail-lists@karan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">hi,<br>
<br>
So we now have RHEL media, RHEL optionals and RHEL Extras. Optionals and<br>
media seems to tie in as before, however Extras has its own policy +<br>
lifeterm etc.<br>
<br>
Thoughts on what we might do with those rpms ? I'd have though that<br>
putting them in CentOS-Extras would line up nicely. Content that is<br>
available out of the blocks to anyone with a CentOS install, but not<br>
themselves included in the distro.<br>
<br>
thoughts ?<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I like that approach. If these packages actually have different lifetime expectancies, may change versions, etc. I think putting them in Base could be problematic. CentOS-Extras seems like a good compromise. Is there any reason these might need to be separated from what was historically in CentOS-Extras?</div>
</div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">-Jeff</div></div>