<html><body><div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Do you publish somewhere those packages, which are built for multilib purposes but are not in the RHEL packagelist? <span style="font-size: 12pt;">I'd like to use them for bootstrapping the EL7 i686 builds and see, what happens. I don't like to use Fedora 19 packages for bootstrapping, since I'd have to do the compilation twice.</span></div><div><br></div><div>I'd like to help building the i686 packages, where should I start?</div><div><br></div><div>Peter Bojtos</div><div>ULX Ltd.</div><div><br></div><hr id="zwchr"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>Feladó: </b>"Johnny Hughes" <johnny@centos.org><br><b>Címzett: </b>centos-devel@centos.org<br><b>Elküldött üzenetek: </b>Csütörtök, 2014. Június 26. 14:05:22<br><b>Tárgy: </b>Re: [CentOS-devel] missing packages from buildlogs repo<br><div><br></div>On 06/26/2014 06:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote:<br>> Hi all,<br>><br>> I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I tried to<br>> use the i686 packages here:<br>> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/<br>><br>> The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing. (that's<br>> ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support)<br>><br>> The interesting part is that there is the source package *cracklib*,<br>> which produces the following packages:<br>> cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python.<br>><br>> Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the other two<br>> packages are missing. How can it be?<br>> Did I miss some information about populating the repo?<br><div><br></div>The multilib packages contained in CentOS-7 x86_64 distro are the same<br>as those contained in the upstream EL7 version, as we purposely match<br>the filelists.<br><div><br></div>As KB stated, all the i686 packages we needed to do the build are in the<br>c7.00.0? (or c7-updates) directories. But even those are not enough for<br>a full tree ... just want we needed to get all the i686 for multilib.<br><div><br></div>We are planning on building a full i686 ARCH, as I have said before. <br>But the x86_64 manifest will not have all the i686 packages, only the<br>multilib ones.<br><div><br></div>So eventually, all the i686 RPMs will be available when we actually<br>build to complete an i686 tree.<br><div><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>CentOS-devel mailing list<br>CentOS-devel@centos.org<br>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div></body></html>