<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 July 2014 08:59, Matthew Miller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org" target="_blank">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:14:27PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>
> I am hoping we can find a way to communicate this and sync with the epel<br>
> folks in a manner that it does not cause too much issues. priorities<br>
> will help i guess, but it will cause issues when people want to consume<br>
> one and not the other ( either way ), specially when its down to libs<br>
<br>
</div>It's getting a bit late, but there is a session on the future of EPEL at<br>
Flock in Prague next month: <a href="http://sched.co/SbXE17" target="_blank">http://sched.co/SbXE17</a> -- it'd be great to have<br>
interested CentOS people there.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I would like to make sure that the CentOS partnership with Red Hat is part of the EPEL discussion. I need to put out an email on this later today.</div>
<div><br></div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div>
</div></div>