<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 September 2014 10:24, Michael Lampe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mlampe0@googlemail.com" target="_blank">mlampe0@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">Jim Perrin wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
On 09/02/2014 08:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
hi<br>
<br>
now that EPEL has moved out of beta, what are the next steps needed to<br>
get epel-release included in CentOS-Extras.<br>
<br>
- KB<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Re-signing the package with the centos key, and then adding it to the<br>
repo. I don't see a need to do anything else.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
What about some kind of preconfigured protection of base repositories? Epel doesn't live up to their own standards of not replacing system packages:<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ooops. I would have preferred to have learned of this on the mailing list before we moved out of beta and also on the epel-devel list. I will work on getting these cleaned up.</div><div>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
# yum -d3 update | grep epel<br>
<br>
--> advancecomp-1.19-1.el7.x86_64 from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> itstool-2.0.2-1.el7.noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> libntlm-1.3-0.6.el7.x86_64 from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> libntlm-devel-1.3-0.6.el7.x86_<u></u>64 from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> libvncserver-0.9.9-0.9.el7.<u></u>x86_64 from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> libvncserver-devel-0.9.9-0.9.<u></u>el7.x86_64 from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-0.16.<u></u>el7.noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.04-<u></u>3.el7.noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> perl-Mozilla-CA-20130114-4.<u></u>el7.noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> python-mako-0.7.3-1.el7.noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
--> python-webob-1.2.3-8.el7.<u></u>noarch from epel excluded (priority)<br>
<br>
# yum list python-webob<br>
<br>
Installed Packages<br>
python-webob.noarch 1.2.3-6.el7 @base<br>
<br>
And for epel 5 and epel 6 this list is much longer.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>All I can say is '#%#@$@#D' and I am sorry. We just cleaned these up a short time ago, and there was supposed to be a job which runs to make sure these conflicts don't happen. </div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
-Michael</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org" target="_blank">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div>
</div></div>