<div dir="ltr"><div>I've generated my own list of ordered sources. Following are the techniques, scripts, and data. Comments or corrections on any of these would be most appreciated.<br><br>Sources of Data<br>1) <a href="http://ftp.redhat.com">ftp.redhat.com</a><br> all *.src.rpm files under redhat/linux/enterprise/6*/en/os/SRPMS<br>2) <a href="http://vault.centos.org">vault.centos.org</a><br> all *.src.rpm files under 6.*/{os,updates,fasttrack}<br><br></div><div>If anyone feels I'm starting from the wrong data, please say so. I debated about including the fasttrack dirs, but as this point I've convinced myself that it is probably correct, or at worst harmless).<br></div><div><br></div><div>I wrote a script to do all the heavy lifting. For args it expects files containing lists of paths to source rpms (there are too many srpms involved to pass them directly on the command line). The script identifies srpms with identical contents by comparing the list of files and their hashs (so a centos rebuilt srpm with no changes is considered a duplicate of the rh one even though some of the headers change (e.g. vendor, buildtime).<br><br>The script sorts first by package name, then by version-release *with dist tag removed*, then by rh vs centos, then by full version-release. An srpm is considered a centos rpm if either the vendor is centos, or a centos dist tag appears in the release, otherwise it is considered an rh srpm.<br><br></div><div>I have posted the script and its current output here:<br><a href="https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.py">https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.py</a><br><a href="https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.log">https://mikem.fedorapeople.org/centos_srpm_sort2.log</a><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org" target="_blank">johnny@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 10/30/2014 11:50 AM, Mike McLean wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> As was discussed before, CentOS-6 SRPMS are going to be imported into<br>
</span>> <a href="http://git.centos.org" target="_blank">git.centos.org</a> <<a href="http://git.centos.org" target="_blank">http://git.centos.org</a>> as well and will be processed<br>
<div><div class="h5">> like CentOS-7 ones are now.<br>
><br>
> We want to bring everything in from 6.0 initial and through 6.4+updates<br>
> initially, then we will do 6.5+updates (as that is changing right now).<br>
><br>
> So, I have created a 6.0 to 6.4 set of lists. These lists live at this<br>
> location:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/EL6-Import/" target="_blank">http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/EL6-Import/</a><br>
><br>
> The two lists so far are:<br>
><br>
> EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt<br>
> centos-6-srpms-modified.txt<br>
><br>
> 1. The EL6-non-mod-SRPMS-sorted.txt is all SRPMS used in CentOS-6 in<br>
> their unmodified form. The order they appear in the file is the order<br>
> they will be imported into git. What is important for history is that<br>
> (for each NAME) they are imported in the correct order, so from 6.0<br>
> through 6.4+updates, the order of packages used in CentOS-6 for<br>
> 389-ds-base would be:<br>
><br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.8.2-1.el6_1.3.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.9.14-1.el6_2.2.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-15.el6.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-18.el6_3.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.10.2-20.el6_3.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-11.el6.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-12.el6_4.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-14.el6_4.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-20.el6_4.src.rpm<br>
> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-22.el6_4.src.rpm<br>
><br>
> All of these packages will come from <a href="http://ftp.redhat.com" target="_blank">ftp.redhat.com</a><br>
</div></div>> <<a href="http://ftp.redhat.com" target="_blank">http://ftp.redhat.com</a>> and be imported.<br>
<span class="">><br>
><br>
> I'm running a test import of the nonmod ones and it appears a number in<br>
> the list have the wrong dist tag in the name.<br>
> For example, bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6.src.rpm should be<br>
> bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2.src.rpm (e.g. .el6_2 instead of .el6). Can you<br>
> confirm?<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, those were wrong in centos .. for those, I think we have the centos<br>
name.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>