<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Karanbir Singh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org" target="_blank">mail-lists@karan.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">>> 5) vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm<br>
>><br>
>> Centos has just one build of vdsm, which does not appear on ftp.rh.c.<br>
><br>
> /var/ftp/pub/nfs/mirror/centos-second/vault/SRPMS/6.1/updates/SRPMS/vdsm-4.9-63.el6.src.rpm<br>
><br>
> I see it as from the 6.1 era according to my 'additive'<br>
> mirroring ... additive in the sense that uniquely named files<br>
> are not deleted once seen, using a bit of basename()<br>
> post-processing<br>
<br>
</span>yeah, i remember this one - it was mis-released upstream iirc, and then<br>
later moved aronud ( was it a rhev package ?? )<span class="im HOEnZb"></span></blockquote><div> <br></div><div>Yes, it appears to have been part of rhev-h.<br><br></div><div>So if it was an error, should we exclude it from the import?<br></div></div></div></div>