<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 January 2015 at 14:35, Johnny Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org" target="_blank">johnny@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I<br>
> > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild.<br>
><br>
> Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have an<br>
> i686.rpm<br>
><br>
> If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to<br>
> make them build:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://fpaste.org/167305/" target="_blank">http://fpaste.org/167305/</a><br>
><br>
> Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages<br>
><br>
> spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm<br>
> spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm<br>
> spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm<br>
> xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm<br>
><br>
> Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC<br>
<br>
</span>Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of x86_64<br>
with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything built.<br>
<br>
I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have that<br>
will build.<br>
<br>
That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that<br>
will not build in i686.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Ah ok. The fact that you called them x86_64 but it said i686 confused me. I would say that the lack of Xspice is going to make the system unusable in the KVM console. Is there a place to see where it didn't build and why? </div></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div></div>
</div></div>