<div dir="ltr">There are a lot of RHEL 5 boxes in production. Any solution that doesn't take it into account isn't a solution for me. <br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Jim Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jperrin@centos.org" target="_blank">jperrin@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
<br>
On 04/29/2015 01:28 PM, leam hall wrote:<br>
> Red Hat seems to not be putting a lot of work into RHEL 5 STIG compliance.<br>
> That's been one of my motivators.<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>EL5 dies in a year and a half or so, and has several outstanding (minor<br>
to medium) cve's presently. I'm absolutely fine with ignoring it until<br>
it goes away as well.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Jim Perrin<br>
The CentOS Project | <a href="http://www.centos.org" target="_blank">http://www.centos.org</a><br>
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div><a href="http://leamhall.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Mind on a Mission</a></div></div>
</div>