<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jperrin@centos.org" target="_blank">jperrin@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
<br>
On 04/29/2015 02:06 PM, leam hall wrote:<br>
> There are a lot of RHEL 5 boxes in production. Any solution that doesn't<br>
> take it into account isn't a solution for me.<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>Oh I know there are tons of el5 boxen. From the project side we'll<br>
continue to provide for them. From a personal side, I'm just not<br>
interested in el5 anymore.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Understood. I'm not against RHEL 7 stuff but don't use it personally. ;)<br><br></div><div>The part that grates on me most is that RH isn't hyped about supporting RHEL 5 much. There are large, paying, installs that could use SCAP, but can't. Thus their SCAP tool is kinda wimpy. <br><br> <br></div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div><a href="http://leamhall.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Mind on a Mission</a></div></div>
</div></div>