<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/03/2015 02:47 AM, Lokesh
Mandvekar wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20150702211704.GC1680@fedora.os1.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos.
some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as
well for more votes.
rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including
systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686">https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686</a> . The main
pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is
RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
WIP rpm files are here: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/">https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/</a> . I've been
adding these to my copr repo here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/">https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/</a> . markllama and lalatenduM
might have something to add to this.
</pre>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
+1 from me (which was understood I guess). I would be happy to help
with maintaining the package in virt7. <br>
<br>
-Lala<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20150702211704.GC1680@fedora.os1.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>