<div dir="ltr">Feel free to file a BZ upstream, as otherwise I seriously doubt that CentOS is going to diverge from RHEL on this.<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nkadel@gmail.com" target="_blank">nkadel@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Alan Pevec <<a href="mailto:apevec@gmail.com">apevec@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> 2016-02-26 17:16 GMT+01:00 Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>>:<br>
>> There were some install issues with some Intel Skylake<br>
>> chipsets/processors for CentOS-7.<br>
>><br>
>> We have created a newer installer to fix this issue and the ISOs<br>
>> (CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1602-99.iso or CentOS-7-x86_64-Minimal-1602-99.iso)<br>
><br>
> What was the fix, is there rhbz# ? On i7 6700 machine I was still<br>
> getting freezes until I've removed rhgb and loadvideo from grub<br>
> config.<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Alan<br>
<br>
</span>Would it seem reasonable to anyone else to simply rip the "rhgb"<br>
option the heck out of the anaconda based grub configuration tool, at<br>
least by default? The extra software stack and features required to<br>
support a pretty "oooh, it's booting!!!" graphical boot process has<br>
repeatedly proven fragile and actually blocks the critical task that<br>
is supposed to run from grub, namely booting the system.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>