<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-22 18:41 GMT+02:00 Jason DeTiberus <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jdetiber@redhat.com" target="_blank">jdetiber@redhat.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Troy Dawson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tdawson@redhat.com" target="_blank">tdawson@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
A couple of key members of our PaaS SIG have developed conflicts with<br>
our current meeting time.<br>
I am proposing that we push our meeting back two hours, still on the<br>
same day of the week.<br>
<br>
New Proposed Time: 1700 UTC - Wedensdays<br>
( date --date="1700 UTC" )<br>
<br>
Does this work for others?<br>
Or will we be loosing more people than we gain?<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>No objections from me.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">You'll probably lose a part of EMEA (and most probably most of everybody East of the UK).</div><br> </div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Jérôme Fenal<br></div>
</div></div>