<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Murilo Opsfelder Araújo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:muriloo@linux.vnet.ibm.com" target="_blank">muriloo@linux.vnet.ibm.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 07/25/2016 12:07 PM, Adi Gangidi wrote:<br>
> Hey Murilo<br>
><br>
> I think so too. Tuned is causing this. But I feel like this shouldn't be the case.<br>
><br>
> It would seem like right thing to do is to ensure post-install out of box governor should be, what's being set in kernel config<br>
> (on-demand).<br>
><br>
> Best<br>
> Adi<br>
<br>
</span>The tuned package is also installed by default on a RHEL 7.2 ppc64le<br>
minimal installation:<br>
<br>
# rpm -q tuned<br>
tuned-2.5.1-4.el7_2.3.noarch<br>
<br>
# rpm -q redhat-release-server<br>
redhat-release-server-7.2-9.<wbr>el7.ppc64le<br>
<br>
I don't believe this is a bug with CentOS; it is just honoring what RHEL<br>
installs by default.<br>
<br>
Perhaps someone from Red Hat on the list can explain the rationale of<br>
installing tuned by default.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Tuned chooses its profile based on the OS variant. See <a href="https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/tuned.git/tree/recommend.conf">https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/tuned.git/tree/recommend.conf</a></div><div><br></div><div>The RHEL Server and Compute Node variants will use the throughput-performance profile, which sets the ondemand governor, while the Workstation and Client variants use the balanced profile, which sets the conservative governor.</div><div><br></div><div>CentOS does not set any variant to <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:19.5px">/etc/system-release-cpe, so it ends up with the default profile being the balanced.</span></div><div><br></div><div>I guess we could add the "server" string to <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:19.5px">/etc/system-release-cpe ? At least for ppc64 and ppc64le, I'm sure that is what we want anyway.</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:19.5px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:19.5px">[]'s</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-size:13px;line-height:19.5px">Gustavo</span></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
Murilo<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.centos.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>