<p dir="ltr"></p>
<p dir="ltr">Il 15/Nov/2016 18:23, &quot;Trevor Hemsley&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:trevor.hemsley@ntlworld.com">trevor.hemsley@ntlworld.com</a>&gt; ha scritto:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On 15/11/16 16:16, Leon Fauster wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Am 15.11.2016 um 15:31 schrieb Karanbir Singh &lt;<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org">mail-lists@karan.org</a>&gt;:<br>
&gt; &gt;&gt; On 15/11/16 13:38, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt;&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.8.1.x86_64.rpm     23-Oct-2015 11:19       1.9M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm      08-Aug-2016 17:36       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.7.1.x86_64.rpm     03-Feb-2016 16:51       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1.x86_64.rpm    14-Apr-2016 12:16       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm    09-Aug-2016 12:53       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.21.1.x86_64.rpm    24-Aug-2016 13:40       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; are this packages intentional (dist tag diff)?<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm      08-Aug-2016 17:36       2.1M<br>
&gt; &gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm    09-Aug-2016 12:53       2.1M<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; That looks to me like the<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7.16.1.x86_64.rpm        08-Aug-2016 17:36       2.1M<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; was wrongly named and was then rereleased the following day with the<br>
&gt; correct one as<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.16.1.x86_64.rpm      09-Aug-2016 12:53       2.1M<br>
&gt;</p>
<p dir="ltr">Yes. That&#39;s right. And we didn&#39;t notice the upgrade issue.<br><br></p>
<p dir="ltr">&gt;<br>
&gt; Trevor<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
&gt; <a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br></p>