<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>В 17:56 +0100 на 23.12.2020 (ср), Daniel Berteaud написа:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: #000000"><div><span id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__">----- Le 23 Déc 20, à 13:24, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@redhat.com> a écrit :<br></span></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="text-align:left;direction:ltr"><div>Hey Mike,</div><br><div>Is there a chance to prolong the Stream's life any further ? Maybe with a SIG ?</div><div>I think that if stream's life was a little bit longer , Stream could have a better adoption .</div><br><div>Best Regards,</div><div>Strahil Nikolov </div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Low chance but not impossible. We just shook things up and the results of that shakeup are a little unclear. The question for a longer lifecycle on stream will depend entirely on why one of the soon-to-be announced RHEL programs won't work for you. So that's a discussion for another time.</div></div></blockquote></div><div>That's the only thing which might prevent me from switching to CentOS Stream. 5 year is quite shorter than the previous CentOS Linux, and only two years of overlap between two major versions isn't enough in a lot of cases.</div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Daniel</div><div><div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>For me it's only 2 1/2 years ... the first 2-3 releases are really unusable and very unstable even on RHEL... </div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards,</div><div>Strahil Nikolov</div></body></html>