<!DOCTYPE html><html><head><title></title><style type="text/css">p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0}</style></head><body><div><br></div><div>On Thu, Aug 5, 2021, at 12:32, Kaleb Keithley wrote:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" id="qt" style=""><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Josh Boyer <<a href="mailto:jwboyer@redhat.com">jwboyer@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="qt-gmail_quote"><blockquote class="qt-gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;"><div>On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:31 AM Kaleb Keithley <<a href="mailto:kkeithle@redhat.com" target="_blank">kkeithle@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:29 AM Sandro Bonazzola <<a href="mailto:sbonazzo@redhat.com" target="_blank">sbonazzo@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div>>> Il giorno gio 8 lug 2021 alle ore 17:47 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <<a href="mailto:amoralej@redhat.com" target="_blank">amoralej@redhat.com</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><div> >>><br></div><div> >>> Hi,<br></div><div> >>><br></div><div> >>> With regards to the update about the plans for CentOS Stream 9 in [1], when should SIGs expect availability of CS9 buildroots in CBS and be able to create c9 branches in <a href="http://git.centos.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">git.centos.org</a>?, once we have signed packages or after getting them published in mirrors?<br></div><div> >>><br></div><div> >><br></div><div> >> I'm also interested in getting some updates on this.<br></div><div> ><br></div><div> ><br></div><div> > Me three.<br></div><div> ><br></div><div> > FWIW, a while ago I opened <a href="https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/313" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://pagure.io/centos-infra/issue/313</a> for the c9s tags, build-targets, and build-roots needed for the Storage SIG packages that I'm involved with.<br></div><div> ><br></div><div> > The last comment was that we need signed c9s RPMs and that there would be updates on the -devel list.<br></div><div> ><br></div><div> > Do we have signed RPMs yet?<br></div><div> <br></div><div> No. Signing work, including getting the requisite access needed to<br></div><div> the HSM and IMA signature work, is still in progress.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Just thinking out loud (or dreaming)—<br></div><div><br></div><div>Would it be possible to get the build-roots and build-targets and probably need the -candidate tags so that we could do c9s scratch builds, i.e. without publishing the results in any repo?<br></div><div><br></div></div><div>-- <br></div><div dir="ltr" class="qt-gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>Kaleb<br></div></div></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div>CentOS-devel mailing list<br></div><div><a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br></div><div><a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is indeed possible, and we're looking into exactly this. I don't have a firm timeline to give for this right now. <br></div><div><br></div><div>--Brian</div></body></html>