<div dir="ltr"><div>For the record, we are also observing the same problem in CloudSIG openstack-antelope testing repo:</div><div><br></div><div>[MIRROR] libsodium-1.0.18-7.el9s.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 1f2a5abe61bdd68bcbee962cf9a3b81158d1e5b987b24f421cb902924d75bb89(sha256) Expected: 8147c75c0454e7e58f5ac3a351e08b8b734ac3ddef803885c085515523ad8327(sha256) <br>(14/194): openstack-barbican-worker-16.0.0-2.el9s.noarch.rpm 2.1 kB/s | 8.4 kB 00:04 <br>[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256) Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256) <br>[MIRROR] python-oslo-concurrency-lang-5.1.1-2.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: cd53374a430a54df57a6482c2805e931dfd0030778a1a16fcf6e8b97a2dda69c(sha256) Expected: e0c44f79afc2568b30e85f3aeb128f375129694c77166bfa07a73c3bacd6bb53(sha256) <br>[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256) Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256) <br>[FAILED] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success <br></div><div><br></div><div>My recommendation for users hitting this so far in CloudSIG or NFV SIG is to move to release repos unless you want to explicitly test new packages recently added to -testing repo.</div><div><br></div><div>Alfredo<br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <<a href="mailto:amoralej@redhat.com">amoralej@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Apparently untagging/tagging packages in the -testing tag is helping to fix the issue in some packages (ovn22.12, openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy, ovn22.09) but not openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s.</div><div><br></div><div>I'm currently untagging it to test the previous build.</div><div><br></div><div>Note that in NFV SIG we are building the same packages in C9S and RHEL9 buildroots with different disttag el9s vs el9. May this be related?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Alfredo<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:53 AM YATIN KAREL <<a href="mailto:yatinkarel@gmail.com" target="_blank">yatinkarel@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Seeing similar issues in Openstack CI[1].</div><div><br></div><div>For example:-</div><div>$ sudo dnf install --repofrompath=tmp,<a href="https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/" target="_blank">https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/</a> --enablerepo=tmp --disablerepo=* openvswitch3.1<br>Added tmp repo from <a href="https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/" target="_blank">https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/</a><br>tmp 11 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 <br>Dependencies resolved.<br>================================================================================================================<br> Package Architecture Version Repository Size<br>================================================================================================================<br>Installing:<br> openvswitch3.1 x86_64 3.1.0-23.el9s tmp 6.8 M<br>Installing dependencies:<br> openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy noarch 1.0-31.el9s tmp 14 k<br><br>Transaction Summary<br>================================================================================================================<br>Install 2 Packages<br><br>Total download size: 6.8 M<br>Installed size: 22 M<br>Is this ok [y/N]: y<br>Downloading Packages:<br>[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) <br>[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) <br>[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) <br>[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256) Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256) <br>[FAILED] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success<br>(2/2): openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s. 1% [- ] 68 kB/s | 109 kB 01:41 ETA<br>The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.<br>You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.<br>Error: Error downloading packages:<br> openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/2020304" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/2020304</a></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks and Regards</div><div>Yatin Karel<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:38 PM Fabian Arrotin <<a href="mailto:arrfab@centos.org" target="_blank">arrfab@centos.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 19/05/2023 15:59, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Il giorno ven 19 mag 2023 alle ore 15:52 Troy Dawson <<a href="mailto:tdawson@redhat.com" target="_blank">tdawson@redhat.com</a> <br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tdawson@redhat.com" target="_blank">tdawson@redhat.com</a>>> ha scritto:<br>
> <br>
> Those don't sound like CentOS packages.<br>
> Centos packages do not have dist tags of .el9s or .el8s<br>
> Please check the repo's those are coming from and contact the<br>
> respective repository owners.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Those are from CentOS SIGs,<br>
> <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630</a> <br>
> <<a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630</a>><br>
> <a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936</a> <br>
> <<a href="https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936</a>><br>
> <br>
<br>
Can you elaborate where you're seeing that ? you mentioned oVirt CI so <br>
outside of centos infra (or outside of CBS)<br>
How do you test , from which repo, etc ?<br>
It's true that packages in -testing are now signed (it was announced <br>
<a href="https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2023-May/142901.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2023-May/142901.html</a>)<br>
but is that for -release ? what about mirrormanager ?<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Fabian Arrotin<br>
The CentOS Project | <a href="https://www.centos.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.centos.org</a><br>
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@<a href="http://fosstodon.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">fosstodon.org</a>]<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org" target="_blank">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br><span>-- </span><br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">Yatin Karel</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org" target="_blank">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>