<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok <<a href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com">mhroncok@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On 14. 02. 24 15:17, Troy Dawson wrote:<br>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:19 AM Neal Gompa <<a href="mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com" target="_blank">ngompa13@gmail.com</a> <br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ngompa13@gmail.com" target="_blank">ngompa13@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 8:07 AM Miro Hrončok <<a href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com" target="_blank">mhroncok@redhat.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mhroncok@redhat.com" target="_blank">mhroncok@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > Hello.<br>
> ><br>
> > What is the planned c10s dist tag scheme? I've noticed many builds use<br>
> .el10+3<br>
> > nowadays. Do we plan to ever lower that down to .el10? And if so, how do we<br>
> > deal with the fact that .el10+3 > .el10?<br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> I believe the plan is to do a mass rebuild after disconnection to move<br>
> to .el10. That will raise the more significant digit (leading number<br>
> in the Release field) to make it effectively higher.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Neal is correct, but it will be a bit more.<br>
> We will bump it once more to .el10+4 today, and do a mass rebuild (Using their <br>
> own buildroots, and nothing from ELN).<br>
> We expect that will take a week.<br>
> We will then change the tag to .el10 and do another mass rebuild.<br>
<br>
Bumping the more significant digit or not?<br>
<br>
> In theory, everything should just build. We'll see how that is in practice.<br>
> There will be a few more things we'll be doing, but in the end everything <br>
> making it into -gate -candidate and -pending will have a .eln10 dist-tag.<br>
<br>
So basically even if it won't sort correctly, the .el10+X uilds are not <br>
intended to be composed/distributed beyond Koji. Do I get that right?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, they are in the composes right now. But you are not expected to use them, and if you are, don't gripe to us.</div><div>There will be no el10+ packages at the RHEL 10 Beta.</div><div>If there are still el10+ packages when we are getting close to beta, start working with the package maintainer.</div><div>In an ideal world, there will be no el10+ packages by the end of the month.</div><div>But I'm a realist, and am expecting something to go wrong somewhere.</div><div>Troy</div><div><br></div></div></div>