On 02/12/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">Karanbir Singh</b> <<a href="mailto:mail-lists@karan.org">mail-lists@karan.org</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Ned Slider wrote:<br> > <a href="http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/Webcams">http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/HardwareList/Webcams</a><br> <br>I don't see the point of 'high end', 'midrange' and 'entry level' sections.</blockquote>
<div><br><snip> <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">People will buy and use the webcam that works for them best, mostly looking<br>
to the wiki as a means of working out which of those have been tested before,<br> etc. So rather than doing the segmentation based on 'range', perhaps more<br> info on the camera / sample video + still output, etc.</blockquote>
</div><br>Ned, I would tend to agree with what KB has written (edited by me, the pedant of the English language, above. :-D )<br><br>Alan.<br>