I thought better to send these links prior to paste into the wiki, as I noticed before about the upstream vendor vs. CentOS "correlation".<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:20 AM, R P Herrold <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:herrold@centos.org">herrold@centos.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Dag Wieers wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, R P Herrold wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Vitor Afonso Strabello wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Can I post a link to the "prominent North American<br>
>>> Enterprise Linux vendor" about it also?<br>
>><br>
>>> <a href="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0397.html" target="_blank">https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0397.html</a><br>
>><br>
>> Counsel for the PNAELV expressly asked that CentOS NOT 'deep<br>
>> link' into their site.<br>
><br>
> Do we have the complete text available ?<br>
<br>
yes -- I see no reason to re-debate their position here, as it<br>
simply picks open old wounds to no good end, and have provided<br>
a link to you privately.<br>
<br>
-- Russ herrold<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-docs mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-docs@centos.org">CentOS-docs@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Inté<br>msn: <a href="mailto:vstrabello@hotmail.com">vstrabello@hotmail.com</a><br>