-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/23/2015 08:33 AM, Corey Henderson wrote: > Thanks, I've reached out to Vlad. Discussion with KB & Rich this morning, we are more interested in getting the 'cloud in a box' included, and it sounds as if Louis is capable of handling the kpatch project as-is without over complicating things. Sound OK to you? Sorry about the fire drill. - - Karsten > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 23, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> >> wrote: >> >>>> On 04/23/2015 02:52 PM, Corey Henderson wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Corey -- I think you should be able to talk with both >>>>> students, but timing is quite short. Do you want to try? >>>>> Yes/no is dependent on below decisions. >>>> >>>> Louis and I previously had a long discussion about scope, and >>>> I think he's okay with expansion. So I mainly just need to >>>> talk to Vlad about it. I'm not exactly sure what I can say >>>> given the no leaking who's accepted rule - I imagine being >>>> point blank "do expanded scope or nothing at all" isn't >>>> ideal. Not sure how else to approach it though. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? > > how about something like : we might have the option to get > multiple people working on this project, is that something which > you can work with ? > > > _______________________________________________ CentOS-gsocadmin > mailing list CentOS-gsocadmin at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-gsocadmin > - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlU5QToACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEExWgCg2rP/mi54A8DzqZOv9kIVi/ak NIkAn1Hj83/U0ZDC9ExyqtwMtHPr7YHW =iq21 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----