[CentOS-mirror] 5.6 is coming closer

Wed Apr 6 17:32:51 UTC 2011
Roelf Wichertjes <info at roelf.org>

So?

This would still lower the load from centos.org.
Isn't it a good idea?


--------------------
Roelf Software
software.roelf.org
www.roelf.org
--------------------

Op 5 apr. 2011 om 22:52 heeft Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> het volgende geschreven:

> On 04/05/2011 12:30 PM, Roelf Wichertjes wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe a idea,
>> Why not choose the least busy ones,
>> Say there are 100 mirrors, 5 are busy and 5 almost unused
>> Isn't it a better idea to let the 5 busy and the 5 unbusy pull from centos.org
>> And have the other 90 pull from the 5 unbusy?
>> That should even the load better.
>>> On 04/05/2011 10:20 AM, Prof. P. Sriram wrote:
>>>> Maybe it's been discussed before, but would it not be worthwhile to do a
>>>> DNS based thing for this? We create a temporary rsync source domain
>>> 
>>> Thats quite a lot of work, I'm more keen on having ACL's in place that
>>> only allow some specific mirrors ( maybe the 100 busiest ones ) to pull
>>> from centos.org; and have everyone else pull from them.
> 
> 
> from 'busy' -i meant more like kernel.org / heanet.ie or mirrorservice.org
> 
> - KB
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-mirror mailing list
> CentOS-mirror at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror