<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername"><a href="mailto:centos-mirror-request@centos.org">centos-mirror-request@centos.org</a></b> <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror-request@centos.org">
centos-mirror-request@centos.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Send CentOS-mirror mailing list submissions to
<br> <a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a><br><br>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror">
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror</a><br>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br> <a href="mailto:centos-mirror-request@centos.org">centos-mirror-request@centos.org
</a><br><br>You can reach the person managing the list at<br> <a href="mailto:centos-mirror-owner@centos.org">centos-mirror-owner@centos.org</a><br><br>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
<br>than "Re: Contents of CentOS-mirror digest..."<br><br><br>Today's Topics:<br><br> 1. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (H. Peter Anvin)<br> 2. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (H. Peter Anvin)
<br> 3. New Mirror (Bill Glick)<br> 4. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br> (Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom)<br> 5. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (Olivier Thauvin)<br> 6. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (Brian Elliott Finley)
<br> 7. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (Brian Elliott Finley)<br> 8. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (Lars Strand)<br> 9. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors. (Johnny Hughes)<br> 10. Re: Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.
<br> (Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom)<br> 11. Re: Syncing of CentOS 5 to mirrors. (Guido Nickels)<br><br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Message: 1<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:30:09 -0700
<br>From: "H. Peter Anvin" <<a href="mailto:hpa@zytor.com">hpa@zytor.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">
centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4624F611.2040907@zytor.com">4624F611.2040907@zytor.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>Lance Davis wrote:<br>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, J.H. wrote:<br>><br>>> <a href="http://Kernel.org">Kernel.org</a> would is completely willing.<br>>><br>>> However would it not make more sense to just set up a second rsync<br>
>> target and explicitly exclude *DVD* or something akin to that so that<br>>> those not wanting the DVD's got everything BUT the dvd isos? That might<br>>> be a lot quicker and simpler than doing a hard linked set of trees.
<br>><br>> Yes, that is fine. We hardlink the trees for other reasons (although<br>> they escape me at the moment :)<br>><br><br>Both are pretty ridiculous, quite frankly.<br><br>Settle on a standard --exclude pattern, and you don't need two trees of
<br>any sort.<br><br>Currently, I believe --exclude *-DVD.iso should work, but --exclude<br>*-DVD*.iso might be a better (future-proof) pattern.<br><br>One can easily export two different rsync modules with and without DVD
<br>images, if that's at all desirable, simply by putting the exclude<br>pattern in rsyncd.conf.<br><br> -hpa<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 2<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:32:12 -0700
<br>From: "H. Peter Anvin" <<a href="mailto:hpa@zytor.com">hpa@zytor.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">
centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4624F68C.6070303@zytor.com">4624F68C.6070303@zytor.com</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<br><br>J.H. wrote:<br>><br>
> Basically<br>><br>>> But what would be the difference ?? - ok I guess they are more specific<br>>> as to what you are going to get, and you may be able to give a different<br>>> bandwidth path ??
<br>><br>> The difference being, when releases happen the public doesn't see what's<br>> being released, where as the mirrors need to be able to see it. I.E.<br>><br>> rw------- <user> <group> centos/5.0
<br>><br>> Would still be invisible during mirror propagation (rsync user is set as<br>> a generic user without permission to access the folder) while the<br>> mirrors connecting would be able to. That is the main difference,
<br>> otherwise 99% of the time the two would return the same data. Also<br>> means that I can have two separate pools of connections say 10 - 20<br>> slots for mirrors and say a hundred for normal downloading which gives a
<br>> mirror a MUCH better chance of getting into and downloading things vs.<br>> the general public.<br>><br><br>FWIW, please use drwxr-x--- as the mode for "bit not yet flipped";<br>otherwise rsync has to run as the mirroring user to allow access for
<br>mirrors.<br><br> -hpa<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 3<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:45:46 -0500<br>From: Bill Glick <<a href="mailto:wglick@ncsa.uiuc.edu">wglick@ncsa.uiuc.edu</a>
><br>Subject: [CentOS-mirror] New Mirror<br>To: <a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:4624F9BA.4040303@ncsa.uiuc.edu">4624F9BA.4040303@ncsa.uiuc.edu</a>
><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br><br>HTTP: <a href="http://mirror.ncsa.uiuc.edu/centos/">http://mirror.ncsa.uiuc.edu/centos/</a><br>FTP: No<br>Rsync: No<br>Sync times: 3x per day<br>Releases: ALL
<br>ISOs: Yes<br>Location: Urbana, IL, US<br>Bandwidth: 760Mb/s (currently limited to 100Mb/s)<br><br>Sponsoring Organization: National Center for Supercomputing Applications<br> URL: <a href="http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/">
http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/</a><br> Contact Email: <a href="mailto:mirror@ncsa.uiuc.edu">mirror@ncsa.uiuc.edu</a><br><br><br>I'm concerned that some of the images in the HEADER.images folder aren't<br>rsyncing. Any idea why that's happening?
<br><br><br>--<br>Bill Glick<br>System Engineer, Production Services Infrastructure<br>NCSA - University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 4<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:56:19 +0100
<br>From: Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom <<a href="mailto:nuno.vieira@nfsi.pt">nuno.vieira@nfsi.pt</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <
<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:EB65FB1D-4F41-4293-82AB-39B2AFB9E0CD@nfsi.pt">EB65FB1D-4F41-4293-82AB-39B2AFB9E0CD@nfsi.pt</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
<br><br>Hello Lance,<br><br>Can you please clarify how can i sync the dvd's from ?<br><br>I am trying to use eu-msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd and<br>msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd without any success.
<br><br>regards,<br>--nvieira<br><br><br>On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Lance Davis wrote:<br><br>> ::CentOS-sync-incdvd<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 5<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 21:34:03 +0200
<br>From: Olivier Thauvin <<a href="mailto:nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org">nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <
<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200704172134.06758.nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org">200704172134.06758.nanardon@nanardon.zarb.org</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
<br><br>Le Monday 16 April 2007, Olivier Thauvin a écrit:<br>> Le Sunday 15 April 2007, Lance Davis a écrit:<br><br>> My server (distrib-coffee) can host and share via ftp/http/rsync DVD iso,<br>> it already does it for mandriva (and it is running a mandriva 2007 64bits).
<br><br>distrib-coffee has now all DVD iso sync from Tier1 mirrors.<br><br>Regards.<br><br><br>-------------- next part --------------<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature
<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: not available<br>Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20070417/94f6e550/attachment-0001.bin">http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20070417/94f6e550/attachment-0001.bin
</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 6<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:32:19 -0500<br>From: Brian Elliott Finley <<a href="mailto:finley@anl.gov">finley@anl.gov</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.
<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:46259143.9090506@anl.gov">46259143.9090506@anl.gov</a>
><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>I agree with hpa on the --exclude pattern bit.<br><br>-Brian<br><br><br>Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom wrote:<br>> Hello Lance,<br>><br>> Can you please clarify how can i sync the dvd's from ?
<br>><br>> I am trying to use eu-msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd and<br>> msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd without any success.<br>><br>> regards,<br>> --nvieira<br>><br>><br>> On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Lance Davis wrote:
<br>><br>>> ::CentOS-sync-incdvd<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> CentOS-mirror mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:CentOS-mirror@centos.org">CentOS-mirror@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror</a><br>><br><br>--<br>Brian Elliott Finley<br>Linux Strategist, CIS<br>Desk: 630.252.4742<br>
Cell: 630.631.6621<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 7<br>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:07 -0500<br>From: Brian Elliott Finley <<a href="mailto:finley@anl.gov">finley@anl.gov</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.
<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:46259263.1070502@anl.gov">46259263.1070502@anl.gov</a>
><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br><br>I'll second nvieira's question -- after all this discussion, what is the<br>proper URI for syncing, including the DVD ISOs? We're currently syncing<br>
everything else just fine.<br><br>If you need IPs for acls, please use these:<br><br> <a href="http://146.137.96.12">146.137.96.12</a><br> <a href="http://146.137.96.64">146.137.96.64</a><br><br>Either machine might do the syncing, but only one is configured as the
<br>active sync machine on any given day.<br><br>-Brian<br><br><br>Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom wrote:<br>> Hello Lance,<br>><br>> Can you please clarify how can i sync the dvd's from ?<br>><br>> I am trying to use
eu-msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd and<br>> msync.centos.org::::CentOS-sync-incdvd without any success.<br>><br>> regards,<br>> --nvieira<br>><br>><br>> On Apr 17, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Lance Davis wrote:
<br>><br>>> ::CentOS-sync-incdvd<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> CentOS-mirror mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:CentOS-mirror@centos.org">CentOS-mirror@centos.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror</a><br>><br><br>--<br>Brian Elliott Finley<br>Linux Strategist, CIS<br>Desk: 630.252.4742<br>
Cell: 630.631.6621<br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 8<br>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:05:26 +0200<br>From: Lars Strand <<a href="mailto:larstra@ifi.uio.no">larstra@ifi.uio.no</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.
<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:20070418070526.GA14887@gnist.org">20070418070526.GA14887@gnist.org
</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8<br><br>On tir, 17 apr 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:<br><br>><br>> Both are pretty ridiculous, quite frankly.<br>><br>> Settle on a standard --exclude pattern, and you don't need two trees of
<br>> any sort.<br>><br>> Currently, I believe --exclude *-DVD.iso should work, but --exclude<br>> *-DVD*.iso might be a better (future-proof) pattern.<br>><br>> One can easily export two different rsync modules with and without DVD
<br>> images, if that's at all desirable, simply by putting the exclude<br>> pattern in rsyncd.conf.<br>><br><br>I totaly agree. It's simpler for CentOS to administrer ONE single<br>repository, and easier for all of us have one repository to deal with.
<br>Most of us have enough disk space for the DVD isos anyway. Those who<br>don't, can use a exclude pattern - which can be documentet on the<br>CentOS mirroring howto page:<br><br> <a href="http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22">
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22</a><br><br>It more KISS and most Linux distributions do this, so why can't<br>CentOS?<br><br>--<br>Lars Strand<br>GnuPG/PGP Key: <a href="http://www.gnist.org/~lars/pubkey.asc">
http://www.gnist.org/~lars/pubkey.asc</a> ID: 972F4325<br>"The Internet? Is that thing still around?" -- Homer Simpson<br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 9<br>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:23:04 -0500
<br>From: Johnny Hughes <<a href="mailto:mailing-lists@hughesjr.com">mailing-lists@hughesjr.com</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <
<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1176884584.3379.356.camel@myth.home.local">1176884584.3379.356.camel@myth.home.local</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<br><br>On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 09:05 +0200, Lars Strand wrote:<br>> On tir, 17 apr 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:<br>><br>> ><br>> > Both are pretty ridiculous, quite frankly.<br>> ><br>> > Settle on a standard --exclude pattern, and you don't need two trees of
<br>> > any sort.<br>> ><br>> > Currently, I believe --exclude *-DVD.iso should work, but --exclude<br>> > *-DVD*.iso might be a better (future-proof) pattern.<br>> ><br>> > One can easily export two different rsync modules with and without DVD
<br>> > images, if that's at all desirable, simply by putting the exclude<br>> > pattern in rsyncd.conf.<br>> ><br>><br>> I totaly agree. It's simpler for CentOS to administrer ONE single<br>
> repository, and easier for all of us have one repository to deal with.<br>> Most of us have enough disk space for the DVD isos anyway. Those who<br>> don't, can use a exclude pattern - which can be documentet on the
<br>> CentOS mirroring howto page:<br>><br>> <a href="http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22">http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22</a><br>><br>> It more KISS and most Linux distributions do this, so why can't
<br>> CentOS?<br><br>Well ... we have several (20-30) internal centos mirrors that we use to<br>distribute the CentOS to the world ... and those mirrors do not all have<br>the DVD on them because we do not have the drive space available on
<br>those donated servers to put all the DVDs on. We do not want to loose<br>half of our mirror bandwidth because we put DVDs in the mainline tree.<br><br>As for external mirrors, I think it would be nice for you to provide 2
<br>targets (one with and one without DVDs) if you carry the DVDs, but it<br>should not be hard to tell people to exclude DVDs if they don't want<br>them.<br><br>In a perfect world, CentOS could just have one tree because all our
<br>internal servers would have > 1TB of storage space and everything would<br>fit on each mirror ... in the real world our internal servers are<br>donated and we get whatever the donor has to offer and we use it in as
<br>many ways as we can to distribute CentOS to millions of people :P<br><br>I hope this makes it easier to understand why the DVDs are a subset on<br>the CentOS mirrors at least.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Johnny Hughes<br>-------------- next part --------------
<br>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>Name: not available<br>Type: application/pgp-signature<br>Size: 189 bytes<br>Desc: This is a digitally signed message part<br>Url : <a href="http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20070418/c38eff4a/attachment-0001.bin">
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20070418/c38eff4a/attachment-0001.bin</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 10<br>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:31:18 +0100<br>From: Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom <
<a href="mailto:nuno.vieira@nfsi.pt">nuno.vieira@nfsi.pt</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Status of dvd iso for CentOS mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">
centos-mirror@centos.org</a>><br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:A8A7904C-CBD8-4E6C-BC4B-35AA599F7E8B@nfsi.pt">A8A7904C-CBD8-4E6C-BC4B-35AA599F7E8B@nfsi.pt</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
<br><br>Hi Johnny,<br><br>Can you send me some samples of how to mirror the DVD tree ? (i<br>believe that other persons in this list, with the same problem, will<br>thank aswell)<br><br>If needed, our IP is <a href="http://81.92.200.26">
81.92.200.26</a><br><br>thanks in advance.<br><br>cheers,<br>--nvieira<br><br><br>On Apr 18, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:<br><br>> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 09:05 +0200, Lars Strand wrote:<br>>> On tir, 17 apr 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
<br>>><br>>>><br>>>> Both are pretty ridiculous, quite frankly.<br>>>><br>>>> Settle on a standard --exclude pattern, and you don't need two<br>>>> trees of<br>>>> any sort.
<br>>>><br>>>> Currently, I believe --exclude *-DVD.iso should work, but --exclude<br>>>> *-DVD*.iso might be a better (future-proof) pattern.<br>>>><br>>>> One can easily export two different rsync modules with and
<br>>>> without DVD<br>>>> images, if that's at all desirable, simply by putting the exclude<br>>>> pattern in rsyncd.conf.<br>>>><br>>><br>>> I totaly agree. It's simpler for CentOS to administrer ONE single
<br>>> repository, and easier for all of us have one repository to deal<br>>> with.<br>>> Most of us have enough disk space for the DVD isos anyway. Those who<br>>> don't, can use a exclude pattern - which can be documentet on the
<br>>> CentOS mirroring howto page:<br>>><br>>> <a href="http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22">http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=22</a><br>>><br>>> It more KISS and most Linux distributions do this, so why can't
<br>>> CentOS?<br>><br>> Well ... we have several (20-30) internal centos mirrors that we<br>> use to<br>> distribute the CentOS to the world ... and those mirrors do not all<br>> have<br>> the DVD on them because we do not have the drive space available on
<br>> those donated servers to put all the DVDs on. We do not want to loose<br>> half of our mirror bandwidth because we put DVDs in the mainline tree.<br>><br>> As for external mirrors, I think it would be nice for you to provide 2
<br>> targets (one with and one without DVDs) if you carry the DVDs, but it<br>> should not be hard to tell people to exclude DVDs if they don't want<br>> them.<br>><br>> In a perfect world, CentOS could just have one tree because all our
<br>> internal servers would have > 1TB of storage space and everything<br>> would<br>> fit on each mirror ... in the real world our internal servers are<br>> donated and we get whatever the donor has to offer and we use it in as
<br>> many ways as we can to distribute CentOS to millions of people :P<br>><br>> I hope this makes it easier to understand why the DVDs are a subset on<br>> the CentOS mirrors at least.<br>><br>> Thanks,
<br>> Johnny Hughes<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> CentOS-mirror mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:CentOS-mirror@centos.org">CentOS-mirror@centos.org</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror">
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror</a><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Message: 11<br>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:32:31 +0200<br>From: Guido Nickels <<a href="mailto:mirrors@intergenia.de">
mirrors@intergenia.de</a>><br>Subject: Re: [CentOS-mirror] Syncing of CentOS 5 to mirrors.<br>To: "Mailing list for CentOS mirrors." <<a href="mailto:centos-mirror@centos.org">centos-mirror@centos.org</a>>
<br>Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1176892351.26658.25.camel@gsn.intergenia.de">1176892351.26658.25.camel@gsn.intergenia.de</a>><br>Content-Type: text/plain<br><br>Am Mittwoch, den 11.04.2007, 23:52 +0100 schrieb Lance Davis:
<br>><br>> The sync seems to be going apace now - we aim to release tomorrow.<br>><br>> Please would mirrors that have synced and have approx 20GB in the<br>> centos/5.0/ tree email this list to confirm.<br>
<br>sorry for being late... <a href="http://centos.intergenia.de">centos.intergenia.de</a> is in sync for CentOS 5.0<br>repos. We had some issue regarding permissions of the 5.0 directory but<br>that's fixed and tested now.
<br><br>Cheers!<br><br>Guido<br><br>Guido S. Nickels<br>intergenia Webhosting AG, Operations<br><br>--<br>Guido S. Nickels Phone: +49 (22 33) 6 12 - 5 06<br>intergenia Webhosting AG Mobile: +49 (1 77) 76 12 - 5 06
<br>Daimlerstrasse 9-11 Fax: +49 (22 33) 6 12 - 5 16<br>Germany, 50354 Huerth Jabber: <a href="mailto:nightwish@sourcecode.de">nightwish@sourcecode.de</a><br><br><br><br>------------------------------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>CentOS-mirror mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CentOS-mirror@centos.org">CentOS-mirror@centos.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror">
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-mirror</a><br><br><br>End of CentOS-mirror Digest, Vol 26, Issue 13<br>*********************************************<br></blockquote></div><br>