[CentOS-virt] Build VirtualBox OSE for CentOS?
gbailey at lxpro.com
Mon Feb 4 15:00:38 UTC 2008
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The FULL version is the one that is available from the site as an RPM
> (VirtualBox-1.5.4_27034_rhel5-1.i586.rpm) and is the binary only app.
> It is *_NOT_OPEN_SOURCE_* and *_NOT_REDISTRIBUTABLE_*. That version
> has all the bells and whistles (usb, iSCSI support, RDP Support,
> etc.). That version is only available for personal use and not
> available for use in businesses without a paid license, there is no
> SRPM for it.
> The Open Source Edition (OSE) is the tarball that is not an RPM:
> It is integrated into ubuntu, gentoo, debian unstable and maybe some
> others, is open source (GPLv2), and it is usable by everyone. It does
> not have an RPM or binary available from the site (the tarball is
> Source aonly files that need compiled) and it does not have usb,
> iSCSI, RDP, support.
This was the reason I wanted to use the OSE (GPLv2) version--I was
working with some people who needed to support a Windows Server 2003
virtual machine, and by using VirtualBox OSE they only had to worry
about licensing Windows (?!) as opposed to BOTH Windows AND VMware Server.
I also think it's nice to have a ready-to-download GPL version because
it provides a mechanism where people who don't have Xen-ready hardware
can experiment with virtualization, and it's much smaller (but
admittedly far less capable) than VMware Server...
> To make this OSE version into an RPM will take some work, but I
> personally would not use it very much as I would probably need usb and
> rdp support for any VM I create ... so that is why I brought it up.
I've made a stab at some of this work, as posted previously:
One of the things I wanted to change from the commercial version was to
make use of DKMS to build the kernel module(s) automagically.
> See this for any questions:
> Johnny Hughes
More information about the CentOS-virt