[CentOS-virt] Status of kernel divider option in 2.6.9-78.0.1
amyagi at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 19:15:57 UTC 2008
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Jeff <jlar310 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeff <jlar310 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Our experience with HZ=100 in 4.6 kernels was nearly perfect time
> sync, at least to within a second over one week. Not so with
> divider=10. I will grab the -78 SRPM and give it a spin.
That is very interesting. This is the first time I've heard about the
difference between the two with regard to timekeeping problems.
Please keep us informed of your testing.
More information about the CentOS-virt