[CentOS-virt] Status of kernel divider option in 2.6.9-78.0.1

[Akemi Yagi]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Jeff <jlar310 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jeff <jlar310 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Our experience with HZ=100 in 4.6 kernels was nearly perfect time
> sync, at least to within a second over one week. Not so with
> divider=10. I will grab the -78 SRPM and give it a spin.

That is very interesting.  This is the first time I've heard about the
difference between the two with regard to timekeeping problems.
Please keep us informed of your testing.

Akemi