[CentOS-virt] Bad Disk Performance of domU
Christopher G. Stach II
cgs at ldsys.net
Tue May 26 18:32:50 UTC 2009
----- "Francisco Pérez" <fperez.x at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks all of you. Just with the nonsparse option works all right.
>
> Then an LVM+nonsparse+phy will be the better setup?
>
> Regards.
Yes, except sparseness is only relevant to file-backed vbds in normal use. (There could ostensibly be a similar lazy block allocation option for a target on something like a SAN/NAS and you would expect some performance degradation for some writes.)
--
Christopher G. Stach II
More information about the CentOS-virt
mailing list