[CentOS-virt] moving from Xen to KVM
Hildebrand, Nils, 232
Nils.Hildebrand at bamf.bund.de
Wed Mar 17 14:15:52 UTC 2010
just two questions:
1. Is there anything faster than XEN-paravirtualization?
2. Why XEN 5?
XEN 3 is quite stable, too.
I have 31 DomUs up and running on a single Box - and have a strong feeling that even 60 will run flawless.
But: All of them are Para-Virtualized.
I have no problem with disk IO-Bottlenecks since my DomUs are not Database-Servers - so there is mostly static information in the filesystems.
I see no reason why I should move to KVM.
My only limitation is memory, since RAM is not being virtually mapped yet.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org
> [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] Im Auftrag von
> Christopher G. Stach II
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 09:04
> An: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
> Betreff: Re: [CentOS-virt] moving from Xen to KVM
> Here are a few tips:
> 1. F*** KVM.
> 2. Stick with Xen because there is quite a lot of time until
> 5 is EOL'd and if you haven't noticed, it's actually a mature
> technology. [...]
More information about the CentOS-virt