<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Daniel de Kok <<a href="mailto:me@danieldk.org">me@danieldk.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim <<a href="mailto:jlim0930@gmail.com">jlim0930@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?<br>
<br>
</div>When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on<br>
their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource,<br>
but that's not supported here.<br>
<br>
Take care,<br>
Daniel<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-virt mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>I was at a recent Linux convention and it seemed very likely that Xen is no longer Redhat's priority at all and would love to put KVM in it's place. The Redhat rep was very adamant about KVMs superiority over Xen and the amount of unnecessary work to integrate Xen into their kernels. Some day when KVM will actually do what Xen does (and do it reliably!) Xen may not be an easy option.<br>
<br>Grant<br><br>