That's great, do you know if he package an update of kmod-kvm and kvm since -36?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:amyagi@gmail.com">amyagi@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Michael Schenck <<a href="mailto:limeschenck@gmail.com">limeschenck@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I see that kvm has been updated since Sept. 08 2007, and qemu hasn't since<br>
> Sept. 12 2007.<br>
><br>
> I understand that redhat is migrating from xen to kvm, I'm curious if that<br>
> has provoked this reduced maintenance or if interest was just lost.<br>
><br>
> If this is of interest to others, Qemu 0.9.1 does provide a lot more<br>
> features lacking in 0.9.0 that I would like to use, including virtio and<br>
> e1000 NIC models, which provide better performance, as well as netbooting<br>
> virtuals.<br>
><br>
> I'm curious to hear everyones thoughts on this.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Daniel de Kok has been busy with real life but I'm sure he is still<br>
interested in pushing kvm forward. He has provided qemu 0.9.1 here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://people.centos.org/daniel/packages/qemu/" target="_blank">http://people.centos.org/daniel/packages/qemu/</a><br>
<br>
Akemi<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-virt mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>