Thanks all of you. Just with the nonsparse option works all right. <br><br> Then an LVM+nonsparse+phy will be the better setup?<br><br>Regards.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/5/20 Christopher G. Stach II <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cgs@ldsys.net">cgs@ldsys.net</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">----- "Francisco Pérez" <<a href="mailto:fperez.x@gmail.com">fperez.x@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div class="im">> LVM on dom0 or domu?<br>
<br>
</div>Dom0. After you pvcreate, vgcreate, and lvcreate (or whatever you need to do), use something like this in your VM's config:<br>
<br>
disk = [ "phy:/dev/XenVolGroup123/foovm456,xvda,w" ]<br>
<br>
If you decide that you prefer the LV setup, you can migrate from your sparse file to a new LV with fdisk, kpartx, and dd.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">Christopher G. Stach II<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-virt mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>