Ok thanks. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Christopher G. Stach II <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cgs@ldsys.net">cgs@ldsys.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">----- "Rich" <<a href="mailto:rhdyes@gmail.com">rhdyes@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> When using a para-virtualized guest, which network type should be<br>
> used?<br>
<br>
</div>Are you asking whether NAT vs. bridged is better? If so, it doesn't matter. The guest is virtualized, remember? It doesn't know or care about what's underneath. What matters is your physical host's network.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Christopher G. Stach II<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS-virt mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt" target="_blank">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>