<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 03/11/2015 00:49, Jean-Marc LIGER a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5637F686.2010106@parisdescartes.fr"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<tt><br>
</tt>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Le 02/11/2015 18:28, Johnny
Hughes a écrit :</tt><tt><br>
</tt></div>
<blockquote cite="mid:56379D50.1050105@centos.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 10/31/2015 04:34 PM, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Lucian,
It seems to be upstream libvirt-1.2.15-2 with options with_xen and
with_libxl enabled.
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348">http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1348</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Right, and we can use that version, or a newer one and enable rbd as well.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<tt>You might use this preview one :</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://people.redhat.com/%7Erjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm">http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/libguestfs-RHEL-7.2-preview/libvirt-1.2.17-3.el7.src.rpm</a></tt><tt><br>
<br>
I personally rebuild libvirt from last official releases which
enable ceph by default for el7 :<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://libvirt.org/sources/">http://libvirt.org/sources/</a><br>
</tt><tt><br>
My dogfooding tests still </tt><tt><strong></strong>can be
found here :<br>
</tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/">https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jmliger/virt7-upstream/</a></tt><br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:56379D50.1050105@centos.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The next question is, is there a difference between the generic rbd and
building against ceph-devel. (As in, is one ceph only and the other
generic only or can you use both when built against ceph-devel, etc)
Since qemu-kvm-ev enables ceph, if we can also enable ceph in libvirt,
seems like a win to me, if it also does rbd the same as building against
librados2-devel and librbd1-devel.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Maybe I'm wrong but ceph-devel seems to have been replaced by librados2-devel and librbd1-devel in el7.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<tt>%package devel-compat</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Summary: Compatibility package for Ceph headers</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Group: Development/Libraries</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>License: LGPL-2.0</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Obsoletes: ceph-devel</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: %{name} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: librados2-devel =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: libradosstriper1-devel =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: librbd1-devel =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: libcephfs1-devel =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Requires: libcephfs_jni1-devel =
%{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>Provides: ceph-devel</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>%description devel-compat</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>This is a compatibility package to accommodate ceph-devel
split into</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>librados2-devel, librbd1-devel and libcephfs1-devel.
Packages still depending</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>on ceph-devel should be fixed to depend on librados2-devel,
librbd1-devel,</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt>libcephfs1-devel or libradosstriper1-devel instead.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt></tt><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5637F686.2010106@parisdescartes.fr"
type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:56379D50.1050105@centos.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">These may only work with CentOS 7 as well .. have to look at if those
build in CentOS 6.7.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<tt>Which ceph release for</tt><tt> CentOS 6.7</tt><tt> </tt><tt>Hammer
or Firefly ?<br>
Jean-Marc Liger<br>
</tt><br>
<blockquote cite="mid:56379D50.1050105@centos.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Thoughts?
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Regards,
Jean-Marc
Le 28/10/2015 09:38, Nux! a écrit :
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Pasi,
Where are these RPMs, how are they built, what exactly are the
differences vs the stock ones?
Regards,
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nux.ro">www.nux.ro</a>
----- Original Message -----
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pasik@iki.fi"><pasik@iki.fi></a>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:centos-virt@centos.org"><centos-virt@centos.org></a>
Sent: Wednesday, 28 October, 2015 08:36:18
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:19:16PM +0000, Nux! wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">To clarify my own request:
RBD (for CEPH) support is available in the version bundled in RHEL
7.2 Beta, so
we'll have it in CentOS 7.2 (or whatever will be the identifying
number).
The hooks seems just like a matter of creating files in the correct
location.
..So, all is good in the world once again.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Except the VirtSIG provides a different version/build of libvirt
rpms, so we
still need to enable RBD/Ceph support separately in VirtSIG provided
version..
-- Pasi
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Regards,
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nux.ro">www.nux.ro</a>
----- Original Message -----
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">From: "Nux!" <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nux@li.nux.ro"><nux@li.nux.ro></a>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:centos-virt@centos.org"><centos-virt@centos.org></a>
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2015 15:22:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
So... how exactly do we proceed?
Anyone from the Virt SIG, please stand up?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.nux.ro">www.nux.ro</a>
----- Original Message -----
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pasik@iki.fi"><pasik@iki.fi></a>
To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:centos-virt@centos.org"><centos-virt@centos.org></a>
Sent: Sunday, 25 October, 2015 11:02:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt enhancement requests
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Nux! wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi folks,
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Hi,
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I know you're rebuilding livbirt for the SIG. Would it be
possible to enable RBD
support in it?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Yes, we should definitely enable RBD / Ceph support in libvirt!
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I know quite a few cases (in the Cloudstack community) that
switched to Ubuntu
particularly because CEPH support was missing.
The recommendation is to rebuild the rpms, but this is not a
viable thing for
everyone. E.g.
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/">http://blog.widodh.nl/2015/04/rebuilding-libvirt-under-centos-7-1-with-rbd-storage-pool-support/</a>
Another thing that I noticed on the CentOS ml recently is an
alleged lack of
hooks, <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html">https://www.libvirt.org/hooks.html</a>
And last but not least, where could I find the libvirt (s)rpms
that the SIG
produces?
Lucian
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">-- Pasi
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:CentOS-virt@centos.org">CentOS-virt@centos.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt">https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>