[Centos] Newer GnuPG (S)RPMS?

[Henk van Lingen]

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:20:33AM +0100, Henk van Lingen wrote:
  > 
  > Has anyone newer GnuPG (S)RPMs than the one coming with CentOS
  > (gnupg-1.2.1-10). That one obviously has problems (for example: it
  > doesn't recognize new signatures on keys when doing 'gpg --import keysfile').
  > 
  > I tried to build new packages from various SRPMs from the Fedora distros.

hm, it checks for it, and gives the wrong answer:

configure:16649: checking for strlwr
configure:16706: gcc -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -fPIE
-O2
-g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -pie conftest.c  >&5
/tmp/cc4bA3qv.o(.text+0x19): In function `main':
/private/rpm/BUILD/gnupg-1.2.6/conftest.c:162: undefined reference to
`strlwr'
/tmp/cc4bA3qv.o(.data.rel+0x0):/private/rpm/BUILD/gnupg-1.2.6/conftest.c:161:
undefined reference to `strlwr'
configure:16712: $? = 0
configure:16715: test -z             || test ! -s conftest.err
configure:16718: $? = 0
configure:16721: test -s conftest
configure:16724: $? = 0
configure:16736: result: yes


regards,
-- 
Henk van Lingen, Systems & Network Administrator              (o-      -+
Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University.                /\        |
phone: +31-30-2535278                                        v_/_
http://henk.vanlingen.net/             http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/