[CentOS] Bacula
Joshua Baker-LePain
jlb17 at duke.edu
Tue Aug 2 15:54:04 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 at 11:50am, Bryan Cardillo wrote
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 10:38:09AM -0400, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> > I'm a long time amanda user, so I may be a bit biased. I looked into
> > bacula a month or so ago for 2 reasons -- 1) tape spanning support (which
> > amanda has only in experimental patches, and 2) native ACL support (amanda
> > uses native tools like tar or dump to actually get the bits off the disk,
> > so ACL support is up to them). I decided against bacula pretty quickly,
> > though, because the scheduling facilities of it are, well, non-existent.
> > You have to make all the scheduling decisions yourself.
>
> I've also used amanda in the past, and looked into bacula
> for the tape spanning support as well. However, I was not
> turned off by having to setup the schedules manually, and
> have been using bacula for several months to backup ~15TB.
> Aside from the tape spanning support (which I think is
> maturing in amanda), I've found having the catalog in a true
> database to be a great feature, particularly when a user
> inevitably request files (the names of which they only
> vaguely remember) be restored.
So, how do you set the schedule? And when do your backups run (what's the
window)?
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
More information about the CentOS
mailing list