[CentOS] Contemplating Move

Greg Knaddison greg.knaddison at gmail.com
Wed Aug 17 01:08:10 UTC 2005


On 8/16/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 17:05 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> > I am doing contract work, and was requested to install FC2
> > on my machine (last October). Since doing that, I have
> > tentatively concluded that the Fedora Core Project is
> > more or less beta test, and not really suitable for development
> > work. Please anyone correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> This is in fact incorrect. CentOS is a better choice for remote servers
> or machines that you don't want to upgrade every year or so, but that
> doesn't make Fedora "beta" quality. It just has a more experimental
> nature and a shorter life cycle.

I'd say that's up for debate.  I don't enjoy constantly refreshing
Fedora installs on my desktop so I use CentOS.  Of course, opinions
are like kids (everyone has one and only theirs is right)...
<snip>
> > Is there any reasonable hope of an "upgrade" from FC2 to CentOS
> > 4.1 or should/must I backup, install, and restore?
> 
> A clean install is recommended, although an upgrade may be possible.
> 

You may have some luck following the steps for upgrading a FC3-FC4 installation:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq

Greg



More information about the CentOS mailing list