[CentOS] Re: Linux Trademarked? -- [OT] time to take this off-list (it's clearly just you and I) ...

[Bryan J. Smith]

On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 23:02 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> My company had no contractural relationships with Company B
> whatsoever.

Well, I was trying to follow your logic.
You changed it in your follow up.

Based on that, you _did_ sell products that were marketed with Company
B's trademark?  Correct?

> No. There were no such agreements. There was exactly one piece of
> software (in many parts) owned wholly and completely by my company.
> Nothing was owned by Company B which Company A acquired by any means
> whatsoever.

Again, please re-iterate in the A, B, C?, D? nomenclature.

A is the software developer/reseller
B are the clients
C is the trademark holder (even if ex-post-facto)
D is someone who licensed something to A (?)

Did A use C's trademark publicly?
Did A use C's trademark in any context?
Is there a D?
Is D the company that originated the name (now trademarked)?



-- 
Bryan J. Smith     b.j.smith at ieee.org     http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman