[CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
Aleksandar Milivojevic
alex at milivojevic.orgThu Dec 1 06:17:25 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Les Mikesell wrote: > With > lilo you had to repeat the install at every change to the config, kernel > or initrd. This is a weak point. With either grub or lilo, you have to edit configuration file. After editing, you run /sbin/lilo, and lilo does the right thing. This is completely automated from kernel postinstall script and requires no user intervention. For the vast majority of users, the only differences between grub and lilo they will ever encounter/notice are: - grub has "fancier" boot-time interface - grub doesn't work out-of-the-box on RAID1 configuration Nothing more and nothing less. Most users will never use any of grub features other than selecting which image to boot (same as in lilo).
- Previous message: [CentOS] Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Next message: [CentOS] why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list