using Cyrus was Re: [CentOS] Re: Planning Mail Server (with low resources)
Robin Mordasiewicz
robin at bullseye.tv
Wed Dec 7 14:16:23 UTC 2005
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Robin Mordasiewicz wrote:
>> cyrus is such a pain, and requires more horsepower on a single box.
>> It is better to run five really crappy cheap servers using courier over
>> NFS
>>
>> if you are not a really experienced email admin, then stay away from
>> cyrus, but on the other hand, if you are an experienced email admin you
>> might like cyrus.
>>
>> Cyrus is nice when you have a couple servers with lots of horsepower IMHO,
>> courier is better for lots of crappy servers.
>
> FUD
speaking from experience. I have used both extensively, and both are
excellent, but I would not leave a cyrus installation in the hands of a
newbie, whereas courier is alot easier to support for people who do not
specialize in mail servers. I dont think its FUD to say that cyrus is
something that an advanced admin may prefer, and a nice thing about
courier is that if you find an old spare machine laying around it is very
easy to integrate into your mail cluster. And a failed courier box does
not affect the rest of the cluster. When a cyrus box fails, there is no
doubt downtime, and you need to know how to fix it as opposed to just
reinstalling another courier box and copying the config files.
More information about the CentOS
mailing list