[CentOS] Huge OO.org packages installed by default
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob at suespammers.org
Wed Dec 14 03:55:25 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:49:41PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > Jeff said that they, at RedHat, didn't agree with package splitting.
> > > It makes maintenance harder, installing more confusing for the
> > > users and, to quote him "harddisk space is cheap".
> > >
> > > So I have to say that this issue goes way back, and is not as
> > > recent as FC4. I don't remember the exact date of this discussion, but
> > > I think it was 2000 or 2001.
> >
> > Yeah a quick check of the mirros shows Mandrake have been splitting it
> > into language packages since it first appeared in the main repoisitory
> > in 9.2 (Oct 2003).
> Well .. OK, I won't get in to political distro discussions ... however;
> CentOS is cloning this condition very well ... and did I mention that
> CentOS is free :)
Well, I think the fact that I was part of this discussion back then,
and I'm using CentOS now, shows where I stand.
Yes, I would love to see more package granularity on CentOS. But all things
considered, I like CentOS better.
[]s
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDn5espdyWzQ5b5ckRAnRnAJ9QPiFjglwj4338kM6SwplGkRytcgCfUntB
uPTFxBf3cLZFPPeuCYZ8U0c=
=+9k0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the CentOS
mailing list