[CentOS] ATRpms repo question...
Jose Alburquerque
jaalburquerque at cox.net
Sun Dec 25 21:23:03 UTC 2005
I think I understand. Your answer clears things up a bit. My resulting
question would be: Will the same rpms that are found in these
repositories appear down the line in the CentOS base rpms repository?
If so, then I would just be a little ahead of the game. Thanks again.
-Jose
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 12:24 -0500, Jose Alburquerque wrote:
>
>
>>Hi. I'm fairly new with CentOS but have been using version 4.2 with
>>great satisfaction (Thank you!). I've been using repos such as Dag and
>>Dries successfully to keep my packages up to date. (I've seen many
>>posts which allow me to believe that these repos won't change CentOS
>>compatibility to RHEL4 or to migrate it another distro for that
>>matter!) My question applies to the ATRpms repo (which has el4 rpms).
>>Can I safely use this repo to "yum update" my system? When I added the
>>repo to the yum repos (and to the up2date repos as well), I noticed more
>>than 100 packages to be updated (some seem to be system packages like
>>alsa-lib, autoconf, glib2, etc.) Can I update with this repo and
>>maintain same basic system and functionality? Thanks for your answers.
>>
>>
>>
>
>ATrpms will replace several base RPMS ... as to whether or not that is
>what you want, that is up to you.
>
>I am normally very careful what RPMS I add to my system that are
>external to the CentOS repos.
>
>I do use Dag's repo (usually with a "includepkgs=" set so that I only
>update packages that I know about).
>
>I am very careful though, and other people have use Dag, Dries and
>ATrpms without problems ... so maybe I am just a little bit too
>cautious.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS at centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list