[CentOS] amd64 benchmarks
Joshua Baker-LePain
jlb17 at duke.eduWed Dec 28 11:43:13 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] amd64 benchmarks
- Next message: [CentOS] amd64 benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 at 2:00pm, Chris Mauritz wrote > Has anyone here benchmarked 64-bit 4.2 against a dual core opteron (or Athlon > 64x2) vs a pair of physical single-core opterons? It's that time of year > again....ordering new workstations. 8-) It's not exactly what you asked for, but have a look at <http://www.duke.edu/~jlb17/dualcore.pdf>. I benchmarked LS-DYNA and matlab on a dual core Opteron based system running 4.1. For each test, I ran 1, then 2, then 4 identical jobs. The bottom line (as always) is that the "right" choice depends on what you intend to run. Codes that are CPU bound (like the structural sims in the above benchmarks) scale almost linearly on dual cores, while codes that are memory intensive (like the thermal sim) do see some reduction in efficiency due to the shared memory controller. Based on my results, I went with dual cores, as thermal sims are in the minority of what we run. -- Joshua Baker-LePain Department of Biomedical Engineering Duke University
- Previous message: [CentOS] amd64 benchmarks
- Next message: [CentOS] amd64 benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list