[CentOS] what the best ? apt-get? yum or urpmi ?
Security
security at air-austral.comThu Jul 28 04:27:28 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] squirrelmail with postfix and dovecot
- Next message: [CentOS] what the best ? apt-get? yum or urpmi ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, I must make a choice concerning the use of a tool used to update rpms: yum, urpmi or apt-get. Personally, I use urpmi every day, without real problems (the dependences, even those of Perl are very well managed), the "hdlist" can be used in several forms , it contains a lot of funtions but, it is not integrated into up2date and does not have a graphic interface that fits Centos3 without break all depedencies. There are also the two others: yum and apt-get. Because Centos uses yum, I would like to have a feedback: speed of calculations for the dependences, comparative with apt-get. There are already opinions on the question (yum is easy to install, more flexible, but less powerful. and to connect itself itself to the sources + download the lists of packages even if no update is avaible...... grrr). So, Wthat need I to use for a Centos-like ditribution? (It's to intagrate the tool on Gralinux final) apt-get + synaptic?? yum+yumi???urpmi in command line only ??? Thanks :) jean-seb
- Previous message: [CentOS] squirrelmail with postfix and dovecot
- Next message: [CentOS] what the best ? apt-get? yum or urpmi ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list