Runlevel document found: I was wrong (Was: [CentOS] Re: Reboots -- LSB 2.1 Core Generic Section 8.5)
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob at suespammers.org
Fri Jun 3 08:07:33 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:52:14AM -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> But, then again, it is completely useless for me to continue arguing
> with you until I provide the document I said I would. Just writing
> e-mails about it won't make my point any stronger.
I just found the document I was refering too.
Uppon rereading it, I noticed that the runlevels were stated as
a "convention", not a "standard".
So I was mistaken, and would like to withdraw my previous point
about there being a standard regarding this.
Sorry about that.
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCoA/FpdyWzQ5b5ckRAgZJAJ42jMI3fh/kqjUmWUssYA6CQH3DggCffa+p
02UCKDvGNkPxdgcdLv4zRsc=
=rHKr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the CentOS
mailing list