[CentOS] Re: New Server Recommendation -- disk label strategy, quotas, etc...
Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@ieee.org>
thebs413 at earthlink.netWed Jun 15 15:43:55 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: New Server Recommendation -- disk label strategy, quotas, etc...
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: New Server Recommendation -- Hot-Swap SATA enclosure ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> LVM/LVM2 helps reduce this, but I still like to use the approach > (except I just don't make spares, I just reserve 15-30% of disk > space for LVM/LVM2). Let me clarify that -- I still put the _whole_ disk under LVM/LVM2 (maybe leaving a legacy BIOS/DOS primary 256MB in a pre-formatted FAT16 if I need it for firmware updates). But instead of pre-allocating "spares" of each size (essential/support/discretionary), I reserve 15-30% of the disk for future allocation by LVM/LVM2. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: New Server Recommendation -- disk label strategy, quotas, etc...
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: New Server Recommendation -- Hot-Swap SATA enclosure ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list