On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 11:29 -0600, Collins Richey wrote: > On 6/4/05, John Hinton <webmaster at ew3d.com> wrote: > > > > > Otherwise, I did have troubles with a LVM install and decided to never > > try that one again... at least for a long time. > > > > Now you have my curiosity aroused. Was this with CentOS3 or 4, ie LVM > or LVM2? What problems? > > We use LVM on all our RH9 setups at work. No problems at all. > > OTOH, LVM2 is a work in progress that RH chose to pass along. I keep > hearing rumors that the support may be more complete in Update 1 > whenever that comes along. > The problem with LVM2 is this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156673 (resize2fs is missing ... should be there in update 1) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050604/7f476471/attachment-0005.sig>