[CentOS] Where is gnumeric in CentOS 4

Johnny Hughes mailing-lists at hughesjr.com
Thu Mar 31 23:55:53 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 15:35 -0800, Joe Harb wrote:
> Even the RHEL4 release notes claim gnumeric in now included.  Has
> anyone checked to see if it is there?
> 

gnumeric was removed by RedHat in RHEL4 (although it was in RHEL4-
Beta2) ... it is therefore removed in CentOS-4.

I have checked the RPMS and SRPMS in RHEL4 ... it is not there

Whether they did it on purpose or by accident I don't know.  We removed
it on purpose in CentOS-4 to mirror what was done in RHEL4.

> Greg Knaddison wrote: 
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:16:37 -0800, Joe Harb <joe-harb at vativ.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > The release notes state that gnumeric has been included in this
> > > distribution.  Was it forgotten?
> > > 
> > >     
> > 
> > I followed the same steps that I followed here:
> > 
> > http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/2005-March/003886.html
> > 
> > And didn't find it in the RH SRPMs.  
> > 
> > They seem to have forgotten it.
> > 
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2005-February/msg00001.html
> > 
> > On purpose...
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128829
> > 
> > It's odd that it's in the stupid release notes, but not in the release.
> > 
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >   
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- 
Johnny Hughes
<http://www.HughesJR.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050331/1cba5164/attachment.bin


More information about the CentOS mailing list