[CentOS] Re: CentOS and SL, together? -- the _real_ history of Red Hat Linux support

[minichaz]

On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 14:10 -0400, Bryan J. Smith  wrote:
> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
> > Here's a classic example: somewhere in the updates of RH 7.2,
> > the apache DSO module for mod_perl was finally compiled with
> > the correct options and became usable as shipped so people
> > running web sites with it no longer had to recompile apache
> > with mod_perl included statically.  This was also supplied
> > in the 7.3 release.  Unfortunately it broke again when RH 8.0
> > moved to apache 2.0 but that's beside the point - or perhaps
> > it was the beginning of the new era.
> 
> Yes, it's a ".0".  We've been through this.
> 
> At this point, I could care less what you think of the 2-2-2, 6-6-6
> model.  I _never_ said it's the "best."  I just said that many of us
> believe it's the best we know of, and several vendors agree.

Guys... As exciting as it is watching you argue this out over and over
again, can you take it off-list now please?

Thanks,
Charlie